Care Situation in Homeopathic Practice

II - Accompanying Treatment for Specialist Diagnoses

The homeopathic treatment of severe pathologies

The homeopathic treatment of severe pathologies of chronic diseases places additional demands on the treatment situation in the outpatient homeopathic practice. Patients usually want a complementary addition to specialist diagnosis and treatment[i]. Extensive case reports, CD's with MRI and CT scans are brought to the case admission.

The need for consultation and in particular patient management in the case of serious and final diagnoses requires not only extensive medical-psychological knowledge but also the ability of the practitioner to reflect on his own and others' perceptions. This is the only way to achieve an authentic and open encounter in which the patient can develop the confidence to make self-determined decisions for his or her life on the basis of solid information.

From the point of view of the practitioner, this means not only being familiar with the latest medical findings in the respective area of specialization. In addition, the patient is expected to be professionally confident in clinical diagnostics, in explaining specialist findings in a comprehensible way, and to have a respectful ethical maturity and firmness in order to accept long-term support.

In addition, there is a familiarity and understanding on the part of the practitioner of the current conventional therapies, the possibilities that exist with them, risks, and the assessment of the possibilities of surgical procedures in the individual case.

Complementary homeopathic treatments in the field of oncology

The most striking finding of the survey shows that such complementary homeopathic treatments are ultimately offered and performed more frequently (>1x/mon.) by a maximum of 10-15% and in the oncological field by less than 10% of all practices.

These figures are also in line with other results of the survey, such as:

  • Length of time in practice to date (>10 years),
  • number of hours worked per week (>40h/week), and
  • extensive accessibility in emergency and crisis management,
  • showing that in fact only 10-15% of current primarily homeopathic practices provide such a full-time service to patients.

These results also include that the decision of a long-term accompaniment is a conscious decision of the responsible patient, especially since the costs, apart from some private insurance contracts, are to a high or to the predominant part completely borne by the patient himself.

For the classical homoeopathic treatment it comes in addition that the costs for medicines make only a vanishingly small portion of the total costs, is paid basically the working time of the treating Homöopath:innen (physician, HP).

Chronic diseases

A special position takes chronic diseases, which occur according to survey results in the ambulatory homoeopathic practice more frequently than 15%.

These are:

  • Chronic pain, often of unclear genesis
  • Hashimoto thyroiditis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Multiple severe arthroses
  • Arterial hypertension
  • Progressive varicosis II
  • Chronic recurrent gastritis

In these cases, patients often expect relief from regular medication, usually due to side effects, as well as a mitigation of progressive deterioration in the course of the accompanying homeopathic treatment.

Success on the part of the patient is therefore not only measured by a symptomatic improvement of chronic complaints.

Knowledge of conventional medication

A comprehensive knowledge of conventional medications, such as painkillers, acid blockers, antihypertensives, L-thyroxine intake, as well as expanded knowledge of medicinal sleep aids, SSRIs, etc., as well as the interaction of frequently prescribed agents is required here for appropriate consultation and, if necessary, specialist review. Often, especially older, multimorbid patients appear with a whole bag full of "pills" about which the participating specialists rarely have a complete overview.

The following are the evaluations of the medical specialties.


[i] When treating patients with specialist diagnoses, they usually bring copies of their findings with them and continue with the coding that has already been carried out (usually ICD-10). For this reason, the information on ICPC-3 is not included in the overview.

Where necessary, the numbers are rounded in the tenth range for a better overview, in order to avoid decimal places which do not change the essential basic statements. Differential diagnostic questions do not usually arise. The presentation of the required skills is explained in the publication on practice QM (section Basic skills and expertise).

Due to a greater proximity to patients, colloquial terms with their vagueness have been deliberately left in many places, e.g. "breast cancer" instead of "breast CA".

The specified ICD-10 are linked to the corresponding page of the BfArm: https://klassifikationen.bfarm.de/icd-10-gm/kode-suche/htmlgm2025/index.htm (ICD-10-GM Version 2025 German) or https://icd.who.int/browse10 (ICD-10 Version 2019 English).

We are constantly updating corrections and welcome error messages or suggestions for improving the proposed diagnosis codes.


Neurological diseases and disorders

Consequences of neurological trauma

Table 1: Neurological diseases and disorders

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Chronic pain

34%

35%

24%

7%

various. Codes (see there)

Polyneuropathy

11%

29%

42%

18%

G60-G64

Multiple Sclerosis

5%

20%

48%

27%

G35.-

Dementia syndromes

5%

19%

41%

35%

F00-F03

Apoplexy, sequelae

3%

20%

51%

26%

I69.

Epilepsy

2%

18%

50%

30%

G40.-

Neurodegenerative diseases

3%

20%

43%

34%

G30-G32

Meningiomas

0%

3%

17%

80%

D32.-

Trauma with neurological complexes of complaints

Consequences of neurological trauma

Table 2: Trauma with neurological complexes of complaints

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Nerve injuries

6%

26%

48%

20%

various. Codes (see there)

Traumatic brain injury

5%

24%

38%

33%

S06.-

Spinal cord trauma

3%

13%

34%

50%

T09.3

Autoimmune diseases

Table 3: Autoimmune diseases

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Hashimoto's thyroiditis

25%

41%

26%

8%

E06.3

Rheumatoid Arthritis

19%

41%

32%

8%

M06.-

Crohn's disease

11%

32%

38%

19%

K50.-

Ulcerative colitis

11%

33%

34%

22%

K51.-

Graves' disease

4%

24%

41%

31%

E05.0

Collagenoses

2%

13%

40%

45%

M30-M36; M35.-

Orthopedic diseases and disorders

Table 4: Orthopedic diseases and disorders

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Severe osteoarthritis

15%

30%

35%

20%

M15-M19

Psoriatic arthritis

8%

24%

39%

29%

L40.-

Benign tumors

1%

10%

27%

62%

see D10-D36

Aseptic bone necrosis

0,25%

3,75%

20%

76%

M87.0-M87.09

Chronic osteomyelitis

0,5%

4%

19%

76,5%

M86.3- M86.69

Sudeck's dystrophy

1%

8%

31%

60%

G90.5

Complaints after joint prosthesis

4%

12%

25%

59%

Indiv. sympt. & M96.88; M96.9

Cardiovascular and vascular diseases

Table 5: Cardiovascular and vascular diseases

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Arterial hypertension

42%

30%

20%

8%

I10-I15

Cardiac weakness/ insufficiency

14%

33%

34%

19%

I50.-

Coronary artery disease (CAD)

10%

24%

37%

29%

I25.1-

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)

3%

17%

38%

42%

I70-I79

Varicosis

18%

30%

32%

20%

I80-I89

Internal diseases

Table 6: Internal diseases

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Chronic or recurrent gastritis

27%

45%

20%

8%

K29.-

Hyperuricemia

17%

33%

36%

14%

E79.0

diabetes mellitus

14%

37%

36%

13%

E10-E14

COPD

9%

31%

35%

25%

J44.-

Celiac disease

6%

24%

39%

31%

K90.0

Sarcoidosis

1%

6%

39%

54%

D86.-

Cirrhosis of the liver

0,5%

7%

34,5%

58%

K74.3-K74.6 + key from K74.7-!

K70.3

Cystic fibrosis

0,25%

2,75%

22%

75%

E84.-

Oncology

Table 7: Oncology

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Breast cancer

9%

24%

39%

28%

C00-C97 Malignant neoplasms

Colorectal cancer

4%

17%

36%

43%

Prostate cancer

3%

14%

37%

46%

Stomach cancer

2%

6%

30%

62%

Pancreatic cancer

2%

4%

26%

68%

Kidney cancer

1%

3%

17%

79%

Other malignant diseases

Table 8: Other malignant diseases

Frequency in practice:

frequent
>10x/year

rarely
up to 10x/year

very rarely
single case over years

not yet treated

ICD-10

Lymphoma

1%

7%

32%

60%

C00-C97 Malignant neoplasms

Leukemia

1%

6%

32%

61%

Malignant bone tumors

0,5%

3%

18%

78,5%

Astrocytomas

0,25%

2%

15,5%

82%

Gliablastomas

0,25%

2%

23,5%

74%


Block I of the survey - Counseling and Treatment Concerns Block III of the survey - Acute in Emergencies Concept of the survey

References

The sources mentioned served as a basis for the creation of the survey for structuring the question blocks. They can also be found as source references at individual points in the overall document on the supply situation in homeopathic practice.

[1] Mader, F. H. & Riedl, B. (2018). Allgemeinmedizin und Praxis (8th ed./first edition 1993). Springer Verlag.

[2] Hopcroft, K. & Forte, V. (2013). Differenzialdiagnostische Tabellen – Symptome in der Allgemeinmedizin (1st ed.). Huber Publishers.

[3] Klimm, H.-D. & Peters-Klimm, F. (Eds.). (2018). Allgemeinmedizin (6th ed.). Georg Thieme Verlag.

[4] Lehrke, P. (1998). Impfkonzepte in der Homöopathie Edition Forschung: Eine Erhebung zum Impfverhalten homöopathischer Ärzte. Hippokrates Publishers.

[5] Impfpflicht versus informierte Entscheidung. (2019, May 2). German Network EBM. Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://www.ebm-netzwerk.de/de/veroeffentlichungen/stellungnahmen-pressemitteilungen May 02, 2019).

[6] Lyons-Wyler, J., Thomas, P. (2021 Jan 22;18(3):936). Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination. Int J Environ Res Public Health. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030936.

[7] Hautärzte sehen Krätze auf dem Vormarsch. (2016, November 28). Physicians Journal. Retrieved May 18, 2022, from https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/71688/Hautaerzte-sehen-Kraetze-auf-dem-Vormarsch

[8] Schultz-Zehden, W. & Bischof, F. (1986). Auge und Psychosomatik (1st ed.). Deutscher Ärzteverlag.

[9] Jobst, D. (2013). Facharztprüfung Allgemeinmedizin: in Fällen Fragen und Antworten (4th ed.). Urban & Fischer Verlag/Elsevier GmbH.

[10] Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cancer Risk. (2015, February 13). American Cancer Society. Retrieved June 1, 2022, from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/medical-treatments/menopausal-hormone-replacement-therapy-and-cancer-risk.html

[11] Günthert, E. A. (2013). Psychosomatische Urologie: Leitfaden für die Praxis-Schriftenreihe der Thure von Uexküll-Akademie für Integrierte Medizin (2nd ed.). Schattauer.

[12] WONCA International Classification Committee, Mally, T., Committee, W. I. C., Tönies, H., Zehnder, K., Fischer, G. & Glehr, R. (2001). Internationale Klassifizierung der medizinischen Primärversorgung ICPC-2. Springer Publishing.

[13] Spinks A., Glasziou P.P., Del Mar C. B. (2021). Antibiotics for treatment of sore throat in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 9;12(12):CD000023. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub5

[14] Schweitzer, R., & Schröder, M. (2018). Die Heilpraktiker-Akademie. Gesetzeskunde, Notfallmedizin und Pharmakologie: Mit Zugang zur Medizinwelt. p.48.

[15] Galic, T. & Schnellrieder, H. (2018). Heilpraktiker mit Fachrichtung Homöopathie – ein Laienclub ohne Bildung? Homöopathie KONKRET. 11.Jahrgang, 12/2018, Heft 4. S.13-20.

[16] International Classification of Primary Care - 3rd Revision. Retrieved 11.1.2025 from https://www.icpc-3.info/

[17] BFARM - ICD-10-GM Version 2025. Retrieved 11.1.2025 from https://klassifikationen.bfarm.de/icd-10-gm/kode-suche/htmlgm2025/index.htm